Skip to main content

Is Spending $80,000 on Private School Justified When You Earn $800,000?

The only person who can deem it "fine" to spend such an extraordinary amount on private school is the parent who has to pay that hefty bill. Undoubtedly, someone with an obscenely high income (think $800,000) can easily afford to pay $80,000 per year on private school.

However, just because someone can spend big money on something worthy, such as educational expenses, doesn't mean one should. Personally, I don't view $80,000 on private school as a very good value for money, regardless of what one's getting paid.

And while this Reddit user , who claims to pull in an income in the high six-figures, may be keen on private, I'd argue that there are much cheaper private schools to put a child in that don't entail paying fees that exceed the annual incomes of most Americans.

Key Points

  • $80,000 on private school seems excessive, even for this high-income earner.

  • The opportunity costs seem too high. But if you’re making $800,000, I suppose it’s “fine” for those who are keen.

  • Are you ahead, or behind on retirement? SmartAsset’s free tool can match you with a financial advisor in minutes to help you answer that today. Each advisor has been carefully vetted, and must act in your best interests. Don’t waste another minute; get started by clicking here. (Sponsor)

The sky-high opportunity costs of overspending on private school

A pretty strong argument could be made that the money that would have otherwise been sunk into private school may have been better invested in other areas to improve the prospects of a child. For instance, saving the money for college or university, I believe, makes a lot more sense.

Indeed, I've heard cases of parents who've paid exorbitant sums of money for many years of private school, only to leave them to pay their own university tuition. Personally, I don't think that makes a ton of sense.

Additionally, the cash could have been set aside to help the child pay off a small mortgage by the time they're all grown up. Indeed, having a home and college bills paid off, I believe, is a better use of excess cash than the very best and most elite private school in the state.

In any case, if one has considered all the opportunity costs and is still fine with spending 10% of one's annual income on an elite private school, one should weigh the added value one will get from a $80,000 school compared to one that costs closer to $60,000 (or even less).

Is a top-tier private school really one's top financial priority?

Though only the parent who's paying the bill can tell if a pricey private school is worth the price of admission, I'd be inclined to think that there are more pressing financial targets to consider first. Indeed, staying ahead on one's retirement should be a priority, as too should saving up for a child's post-secondary pursuits.

And while our high-income earner may be taking less of a financial sacrifice compared to most other families, I still think saving and investing the sum for a child's future is the smarter move, especially given the profound disruptive potential of artificial intelligence (AI) and its impact on the labor market over the next two decades.

What about the AI factor?

As machines start displacing more white-collar jobs, it's unclear as to whether top-notch private schools and college degrees will still be as valuable in the job market, especially if we are in for a great displacement of sorts.

Recently, Anthropic CEO warned that AI could eliminate around half of white-collar jobs within five years. That's quite alarming and should be taken into consideration before spending on an educational pursuit that may not necessarily translate into better work prospects.

Given such profound uncertainty, I'd argue it's best to shore up a rainy day fund, not just for oneself, but for one's children, as well.

The bottom line

In short, I think it's fine for this specific high-earning individual to spend 10% of their paycheck on private school, provided they're aware of the opportunity costs, uncertainties posed by AI, and the risk of failing to achieve a satisfactory return on investment.

Given such risks and unknowns, I'd argue that investing $80,000 annually on private school won't provide the best return in the world. We all want to see our children thrive, but there are arguably better ways to give them a head start in life.

You worked hard to build a six-figure portfolio. But, you’re aware that building a comfortable retirement not just about saving— it’s about strategy . For example, if you’re not taking taxes into account, you’re missing out on a key input to optimize your wealth. Answer a few simple questions to find a financial advisor who can help you take steps to wield your assets in ways to compound over time. Click here to get started now. (Sponsor)

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Roxanne Perez Embraces 'The Prodigy' Moniker, Soars Toward WWE Money in the Bank

(This story originally appeared on USA TODAY .) One way to identify who are the top wrestlers is by who has a nickname. More often than not, those with a tag are some of the greats. There’s “The Heartbreak Kid” Shawn Michaels. “The Nature Boy” Ric Flair. “The Tribal Chief” Roman Reigns. “The Viper” Randy Orton. “The Man” Becky Lynch. “The Champ” John Cena. The list goes on and on. From NFL plays to college sports scores, all the top sports news you need to know every day. What do they all have in common? All the aforementioned stars earned their names during their career. It took championship reigns, iconic matches and memorable moments while earning the crowd’s praise for them to be bestowed the honor. Then there’s Roxanne Perez. From the moment she signed with WWE at age 20, Perez has been dubbed “The Prodigy.” Meaning a highly talented youth, the nickname set incredible expectations for her. How can you be named “The Prodigy” and not becom...

What Bank of America's 2025 Forecasts Mean for Homebuyers

Advertising Disclosure: When you buy something by clicking links within this article, we may earn a small commission, but it never affects the products or services we recommend. The housing market’s been a rollercoaster lately, and if you’re thinking about buying a home, you’re probably wondering when things might finally turn in your favor. Bank of America just dropped its 2025 housing predictions, and while there’s reason for cautious optimism, the path forward isn’t exactly straightforward. More than half of potential buyers think the market’s better than it was a year ago, according to Bank of America’s latest Homebuyer Insights Report . Meanwhile, 75% expect mortgage rates to dip and prices to ease up, but they’re still sitting on the sidelines, waiting for that to happen. Don't Miss Want to earn $50-$200 monthly completing surveys in your spare time? This reliable side income requires minimal effort for maximum reward. You can redeem your rewards in c...

Superfans Swear by the $449 Nintendo Switch 2: 'Absolutely Worth It!' Waited 24+ Hours for This Game-Changer

It's been more than 25 years since Nintendo held a console launch where Edwin Flores wasn't among the first in line. The avid gamer was at the Times Square Toys R Us for the launch of the GameCube in 2001, and has been there at midnight to be among the first in the world to get his hands on the Wii in 2006, Wii U in 2012, Nintendo Switch in 2017 and its OLED upgrade in 2021. "You have to live this," the 50-year-old told Make It outside Nintendo's global flagship store in New York City on Wednesday morning. "When you're in a place where everyone likes the same thing as you, it's fun." Flores arrived to West 48th street at 11:30 p.m. Tuesday, a little more than 24 hours ahead of the Thursday midnight launch of the hotly-anticipated Switch 2. And he came prepared to splurge, having been slowly setting aside money for years ever since rumors of a new Switch first began surfacing online. "I'm going to buy one for me and one ...